blank Quick help
blank Maintenance news

Scheduled maintenance

Regular maintenance outages:
between 05.00 and 05.15 hrs CET (Monday to Sunday).

Other outages
Availability

2022.02.11

More...
blank News flashes

News Flashes

New version of the European Patent Register – SPC proceedings information in the Unitary Patent Register.

2024-07-24

More...
blank Related links

Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP1684228

EP1684228 - Scoring with Baysian algorithm [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusThe application has been refused
Status updated on  21.06.2013
Database last updated on 29.03.2025
Most recent event   Tooltip21.06.2013Refusal of applicationpublished on 24.07.2013  [2013/30]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052 / US
[N/P]
Former [2006/30]For all designated states
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond WA 98052 / US
Inventor(s)01 / Herbrich, Rolf
c/o MICROSOFT CORPORATION One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052 / US
02 / Graepel, Thore K.H.
c/o MICROSOFT CORPORATION One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052 / US
 [2006/35]
Former [2006/30]01 / Herbrich, Rolf
c/o MICROSOFT CORPORATION One Microsoft Way
98052, Redmond / US
02 / Graepel, Thore K.H.
c/o MICROSOFT CORPORATION One Microsoft Way
98052, Redmond / US
Representative(s)Free, Rachel Alder, et al
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro
Olswang LLP
Cannon Place
78 Cannon Street
London EC4N 6AF / GB
[N/P]
Former [2010/20]Free, Rachel Alder, et al
Olswang LLP 90 High Holborn London
WC1V 6XX / GB
Former [2006/30]Grünecker, Kinkeldey, Stockmair & Schwanhäusser Anwaltssozietät
Maximilianstrasse 58
80538 München / DE
Application number, filing date06100075.804.01.2006
[2006/30]
Priority number, dateUS2005004175224.01.2005         Original published format: US 41752
[2006/30]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP1684228
Date:26.07.2006
Language:EN
[2006/30]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP26.05.2006
ClassificationIPC:G06Q10/00
[2006/30]
CPC:
G06Q10/06 (EP,US); G09B7/02 (EP,US); A63B71/06 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesAT,   BE,   BG,   CH,   CY,   CZ,   DE,   DK,   EE,   ES,   FI,   FR,   GB,   GR,   HU,   IE,   IS,   IT,   LI,   LT,   LU,   LV,   MC,   NL,   PL,   PT,   RO,   SE,   SI,   SK,   TR [2006/30]
TitleGerman:Punktebewertung mittels Bayesian-Algorithm[2006/30]
English:Scoring with Baysian algorithm[2006/30]
French:Valuer au moyen d'un algorithm Bayesien[2006/30]
Examination procedure17.01.2007Examination requested  [2007/09]
24.04.2007Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M08)
11.12.2007Reply to a communication from the examining division
16.12.2008Date of oral proceedings
17.12.2008Date of oral proceedings
20.01.2010Despatch of communication that the application is refused, reason: substantive examination [2013/30]
20.01.2010Minutes of oral proceedings despatched
28.02.2013Application refused, date of legal effect [2013/30]
Appeal following examination22.03.2010Appeal received No.  T1281/10
20.05.2010Statement of grounds filed
28.02.2013Result of appeal procedure: appeal of the applicant was rejected
28.02.2013Date of oral proceedings
05.03.2013Minutes of oral proceedings despatched
Divisional application(s)The date of the Examining Division's first communication in respect of the earliest application for which a communication has been issued is  24.04.2007
Fees paidRenewal fee
14.01.2008Renewal fee patent year 03
31.03.2008Renewal fee patent year 04
13.01.2010Renewal fee patent year 05
14.01.2011Renewal fee patent year 06
11.01.2012Renewal fee patent year 07
08.01.2013Renewal fee patent year 08
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search   [ ] - No Search
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.