-
EP2546787
European procedure
- EP About this file
- EP Legal status
- EP Federated register
- EP Event history
- EP Citations
- EP Patent family
- EP All documents
Extract from the Register of European Patents
EP About this file: EP2546787
| EP2546787 - Fare invalidation auditing system [Right-click to bookmark this link] | Status | The application is deemed to be withdrawn Status updated on 06.12.2013 Database last updated on 02.08.2024 | Most recent event Tooltip | 06.12.2013 | Application deemed to be withdrawn | published on 08.01.2014 [2014/02] | Applicant(s) | For all designated states Amadeus S.A.S. 485 Route du Pin Montard Sophia Antipolis 06410 Biot / FR | [N/P] |
| Former [2013/03] | For all designated states Amadeus S.A.S. 485 Route du Pin Montard, Sophia Antipolis 06410 Biot / FR | Inventor(s) | 01 /
Landra, Corinne 21 chemin des Moutons 06650 LE ROURET / FR | 02 /
Dourthe, Cédric 28 Rue de Lepante 06000 NICE / FR | 03 /
Camberbec Aurélie 25 bd maréchal Leclerc 06130 GRASSE / FR | [2013/03] | Representative(s) | Decobert, Jean-Pascal Cabinet Hautier 20, rue de la Liberté 06000 Nice / FR | [N/P] |
| Former [2013/03] | Decobert, Jean-Pascal Cabinet Hautier 20, rue de la Liberté 06000 Nice / FR | Application number, filing date | 11305924.0 | 13.07.2011 | [2013/03] | Filing language | EN | Procedural language | EN | Publication | Type: | A1 Application with search report | No.: | EP2546787 | Date: | 16.01.2013 | Language: | EN | [2013/03] | Search report(s) | (Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on: | EP | 01.12.2011 | Classification | IPC: | G06Q10/00, G06Q50/00 | [2013/03] | CPC: |
G06Q10/02 (EP,US);
G06Q50/14 (EP,US)
| Designated contracting states | AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LI, LT, LU, LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TR [2013/03] | Extension states | BA | Not yet paid | ME | Not yet paid | Title | German: | System zur Prüfung von Reisepreisannulierung | [2013/03] | English: | Fare invalidation auditing system | [2013/03] | French: | Système de contrôle de l'invalidation de tarifs | [2013/03] | Examination procedure | 17.07.2013 | Application deemed to be withdrawn, date of legal effect [2014/02] | 22.08.2013 | Despatch of communication that the application is deemed to be withdrawn, reason: examination fee not paid in time [2014/02] | Fees paid | Penalty fee | Additional fee for renewal fee | 31.07.2013 | 03 M06 Not yet paid |
| Opt-out from the exclusive Tooltip competence of the Unified Patent Court | See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data | ||
| Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court. | Documents cited: | Search | [L] - EPO, "Mitteilung des Europäischen Patentamts vom 1. Oktober 2007 über Geschäftsmethoden = Notice from the European Patent Office dated 1 October 2007 concerning business methods = Communiqué de l'Office européen des brevets,en date du 1er octobre 2007, concernant les méthodes dans le domaine des activités", JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS.OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE.AMTSBLATTT DES EUROPAEISCHEN PATENTAMTS, OEB, MUNCHEN, DE, (20071101), vol. 30, no. 11, ISSN 0170-9291, pages 592 - 593, XP007905525 [L] 1-7 * The claimed subject matter, with due regard to the description and drawings, relates to processes comprised in the list of subject matter and activities excluded from patentability under Art.52(2) and (3) EPC. The applicant is advised that in accordance with the established practice of the EPO, no search need be performed in respect of those aspects of the claimed invention. The only identifiable technical aspects of the claimed invention relate to the use of conventional, general-purpose data processing technology for processing data of an inherently non-technical nature. The information technology employed is considered to have been generally known as it was widely available to everyone at the date of filing/priority of the present application. The notoriety of such prior art cannot reasonably be contested. No documentary evidence was therefore considered required. * | by applicant | US2003130901 | US2004199441 | WO2009106492 |