blank Quick help
blank Maintenance news

Scheduled maintenance

Regular maintenance outages:
between 05.00 and 05.15 hrs CET (Monday to Sunday).

Other outages
Availability

2022.02.11

More...
blank News flashes

News Flashes

New version of the European Patent Register – SPC proceedings information in the Unitary Patent Register.

2024-07-24

More...
blank Related links

Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP4088854

EP4088854 - METHOD FOR COMPARING LASER PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR MONITORING A LASER PROCESSING PROCESS AND ASSOCIATED LASER PROCESSING SYSTEM [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusRequest for examination was made
Status updated on  14.10.2022
Database last updated on 19.10.2024
Most recent event   Tooltip05.06.2024New entry: Additional fee for renewal fee: despatch of communication + time limit 
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Precitec GmbH & Co. KG
Draisstraße 1
76571 Gaggenau-Bad Rotenfels / DE
[2022/46]
Inventor(s)01 / Boco, Attila
76571 Gaggenau / DE
02 / Staudenmaier, Florian
76199 Karlsruhe / DE
03 / Spoerl, Georg
76287 Rheinstetten / DE
04 / Strebel, Matthias
76571 Gaggenau / DE
 [2022/46]
Representative(s)Ter Meer Steinmeister & Partner
Patentanwälte mbB
Nymphenburger Straße 4
80335 München / DE
[2022/46]
Application number, filing date22168848.419.04.2022
[2022/46]
Priority number, dateDE20211010978719.04.2021         Original published format: DE102021109787
[2022/46]
Filing languageDE
Procedural languageDE
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP4088854
Date:16.11.2022
Language:DE
[2022/46]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP19.10.2022
ClassificationIPC:B23K26/03, B23K26/60, B23K26/70, B23K31/12
[2022/46]
CPC:
B23K26/702 (EP); B23K26/705 (EP,CN,US); B23K26/032 (EP);
B23K26/034 (EP); B23K26/043 (US); B23K26/0643 (CN);
B23K26/0648 (CN); B23K26/60 (EP); B23K26/707 (EP);
B23K31/125 (EP) (-)
Designated contracting statesAL,   AT,   BE,   BG,   CH,   CY,   CZ,   DE,   DK,   EE,   ES,   FI,   FR,   GB,   GR,   HR,   HU,   IE,   IS,   IT,   LI,   LT,   LU,   LV,   MC,   MK,   MT,   NL,   NO,   PL,   PT,   RO,   RS,   SE,   SI,   SK,   SM,   TR [2023/04]
Former [2022/46]AL,  AT,  BE,  BG,  CH,  CY,  CZ,  DE,  DK,  EE,  ES,  FI,  FR,  GB,  GR,  HR,  HU,  IE,  IS,  IT,  LI,  LT,  LU,  LV,  MC,  MK,  MT,  NL,  NO,  PL,  PT,  RO,  RS,  SE,  SI,  SK,  SM,  TR 
Extension statesBANot yet paid
MENot yet paid
Validation statesKHNot yet paid
MANot yet paid
MDNot yet paid
TNNot yet paid
TitleGerman:VERFAHREN ZUM VERGLEICHEN VON LASERBEARBEITUNGSSYSTEMEN UND VERFAHREN ZUM ÜBERWACHEN EINES LASERBEARBEITUNGSPROZESSES SOWIE DAZUGEHÖRIGES LASERBEARBEITUNGSSYSTEM[2022/46]
English:METHOD FOR COMPARING LASER PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR MONITORING A LASER PROCESSING PROCESS AND ASSOCIATED LASER PROCESSING SYSTEM[2022/46]
French:PROCÉDÉ DE COMPARAISON DES SYSTÈMES D'USINAGE LASER ET PROCÉDÉ DE SURVEILLANCE D'UN PROCESSUS D'USINAGE LASER, AINSI QUE SYSTÈME D'USINAGE LASER ASSOCIÉ[2022/46]
Examination procedure19.04.2022Examination requested  [2022/46]
21.12.2022Amendment by applicant (claims and/or description)
21.12.2022Date on which the examining division has become responsible
Fees paidPenalty fee
Additional fee for renewal fee
30.04.202403   M06   Not yet paid
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search[A]WO2020099421  (TRUMPF LASER & SYSTEMTECHNIK GMBH [DE]) [A] 1-15* the whole document *;
 [XY]DE102019122047  (PRECITEC GMBH & CO KG [DE]) [X] 1-10 * figure 1 * * paragraphs [0004] , [0005] , [0012] , [0021] , [0022] , [0024] , [0025] , [0031] - [0035] - [0044] , [0070] * [Y] 11-15;
 [Y]DE102019127900  (PRECITEC GMBH & CO KG [DE]) [Y] 11-15 * figures 1,4 * * paragraphs [0001] , [0008] , [0015] , [0017] , [0039] , [0048] - [0051] *
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.