blank Quick help
blank Maintenance news
blank News flashes
blank Related links

Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0194331

EP0194331 - Inspecting device for print [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusOpposition rejected
Status updated on  10.01.1996
Database last updated on 10.05.2025
Most recent event   Tooltip05.10.2005Change: Appeal number 
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Toppan Printing Co., Ltd.
5-1, 1-chome, Taito Taito-ku
Tokyo 110-0016 / JP
For all designated states
MITSUBISHI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
5-1, Marunouchi 2-chome Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100 / JP
[N/P]
Inventor(s)01 / Masuda, Toshiro
3-8-402, Izumi-cho
Itabashi-ku Tokyo / JP
02 / Fujita, Toshiji
5-20-7, Nobitome
Niiza-shi Saitama-ken / JP
03 / Ishizuka, Kouichi
5-7-3, Minamikoshigaya
Koshigaya-shi Saitama-ken / JP
04 / Kinoshita, Yoshio
1043-53, Sojo
Nutanischicho Mihara-shi Hiroshima-ken / JP
[1986/38]
Representative(s)Tiedtke, Harro, et al
Patentanwaltsbüro
Tiedtke-Bühling-Kinne & Partner
Bavariaring 4
80336 München / DE
[N/P]
Application number, filing date85102956.114.03.1985
[1986/38]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP0194331
Date:17.09.1986
Language:EN
[1986/38]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP0194331
Date:18.07.1990
Language:EN
[1990/29]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP16.12.1985
ClassificationIPC:B41F33/00
[1986/38]
CPC:
B41F33/0036 (EP,US); H04N1/00037 (EP,US); G01N21/956 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesCH,   DE,   IT,   LI [1986/38]
TitleGerman:Einrichtung zum Überprüfen von Abdrücken[1986/38]
English:Inspecting device for print[1986/38]
French:Dispositif d'inspection d'impressions[1986/38]
Examination procedure20.02.1987Examination requested  [1987/17]
24.06.1988Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06)
03.01.1989Reply to a communication from the examining division
16.03.1989Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
25.07.1989Reply to a communication from the examining division
13.11.1989Despatch of communication of intention to grant (Approval: Yes)
17.01.1990Communication of intention to grant the patent
17.04.1990Fee for grant paid
17.04.1990Fee for publishing/printing paid
Opposition(s)Opponent(s)01  05.04.1991  19.04.1991  ADMISSIBLE
MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG
Patentabteilung Postfach 10 12 64
D-63012 Offenbach / DE
 02  17.04.1991  06.05.1991  ADMISSIBLE
GAO Gesellschaft für Automation und Organisation mbH
Euckenstrasse 12
D-81369 München / DE
Opponent's representative
Klunker . Schmitt-Nilson . Hirsch, et al, et al
Patentanwälte
Destouchesstraße 68
80796 München / DE
 [N/P]
23.05.1991Invitation to proprietor to file observations on the notice of opposition
22.11.1991Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition
03.12.1991Communication of observations of patent proprietor (Time limit: M04)
13.04.1992Reply of parties involved to observations of patent proprietor
25.01.1993Date of despatch of rejection of opposition
29.11.1995Legal effect of rejection of opposition [1996/08]
Appeal following opposition17.02.1993Appeal received No.  T0179/93
24.05.1993Statement of grounds filed
29.11.1995Result of appeal procedure: appeal of the opponent was rejected
29.11.1995Date of oral proceedings
15.12.1995Minutes of the oral proceedings despatched
Fees paidRenewal fee
04.03.1987Renewal fee patent year 03
22.03.1988Renewal fee patent year 04
23.03.1989Renewal fee patent year 05
28.03.1990Renewal fee patent year 06
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search[A]GB2115145  (DAINIPPON PRINTING CO LTD);
 [AD]GB2066949  (DAINIPPON PRINTING CO LTD);
 [A]GB2044925  (RCA CORP);
 [A]GB2119928  (POWERS MANUFACTURING)
by applicantUS4488808
 GB2044925
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.