blank Quick help
blank Maintenance news
blank News flashes
blank Related links

Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0378636

EP0378636 - SNOW MAKING EQUIPMENT AND METHOD [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusPatent maintained as amended
Status updated on  19.07.2002
Database last updated on 05.04.2025
Most recent event   Tooltip05.10.2005Change: Appeal number 
Applicant(s)For all designated states
CLULOW, Malcolm George
7 Fieldfare Court, Spennells Valley
Kidderminster DY10 4TT / GB
[1990/30]
Inventor(s)01 / see applicant
...
[1990/30]
Representative(s)Cowan, David Robert, et al
Withers & Rogers LLP Goldings House, 2 Hays Lane
London SE1 2HW / GB
[N/P]
Application number, filing date89907236.719.06.1989
[1990/30]
WO1989GB00685
Priority number, dateGB1988001476922.06.1988         Original published format: GB 8814769
GB1989000330414.02.1989         Original published format: GB 8903304
[1990/30]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report
No.:WO8912793
Date:28.12.1989
Language:EN
[1989/30]
Type: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP0378636
Date:25.07.1990
Language:EN
The application published by WIPO in one of the EPO official languages on 28.12.1989 takes the place of the publication of the European patent application.
[1990/30]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP0378636
Date:29.04.1998
Language:EN
[1998/18]
Type: B2 New European patent specification 
No.:EP0378636
Date:04.09.2002
Language:EN
[2002/36]
Search report(s)International search report - published on:EP28.12.1989
ClassificationIPC:F25C3/04, A63C19/10
[1990/30]
CPC:
A63C19/10 (EP,US); F25C3/04 (EP,KR,US); F25C2303/0481 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesAT,   BE,   CH,   DE,   FR,   IT,   LI,   LU,   NL,   SE [1990/30]
TitleGerman:SCHNEE-ERZEUGUNGSEINRICHTUNG UND -VERFAHREN[1998/18]
English:SNOW MAKING EQUIPMENT AND METHOD[1998/18]
French:EQUIPEMENT ET METHODE DE FABRICATION DE NEIGE[1998/18]
Entry into regional phase12.03.1990National basic fee paid 
12.03.1990Designation fee(s) paid 
25.05.1990Examination fee paid 
Examination procedure25.05.1990Examination requested  [1990/30]
02.08.1991Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06)
17.03.1992Despatch of communication that the application is deemed to be withdrawn, reason: reply to the communication from the examining division not received in time
02.04.1992Reply to a communication from the examining division
11.06.1992Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
01.10.1992Reply to a communication from the examining division
12.03.1993Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
13.04.1993Reply to a communication from the examining division
22.09.1993Despatch of communication that the application is refused, reason: substantive examination {1}
12.08.1997Despatch of communication of intention to grant (Approval: Yes)
07.10.1997Communication of intention to grant the patent
05.01.1998Fee for grant paid
05.01.1998Fee for publishing/printing paid
Appeal following examination18.11.1993Appeal received No.  T0079/94
19.01.1994Statement of grounds filed
15.05.1996Invitation to file observations in an appeal (Time limit: M04) [1996/20]
16.09.1996Date of receipt of observations in an appeal [1996/38]
19.12.1996Invitation to file observations in an appeal (Time limit: M04) [1996/51]
17.04.1997Date of receipt of observations in an appeal [1997/16]
12.08.1997Result of appeal procedure: remittal for grant
Opposition(s)Opponent(s)01  29.01.1999    ADMISSIBLE
LINDE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Abraham-Lincoln-Strasse 21
D-65189 Wiesbaden / DE
Opponents representative
Obermüller, Bernhard
Linde Aktiengesellschaft Zentrale Patentabteilung
82049 Höllriegelskreuth / DE
 [N/P]
01.03.1999Invitation to proprietor to file observations on the notice of opposition
06.07.1999Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition
19.10.2000Date of oral proceedings
13.11.2000Despatch of minutes of oral proceedings
13.11.2000Despatch of communication that the patent will be revoked
14.02.2002Despatch of interlocutory decision in opposition
14.02.2002Legal effect of interlocutory decision in opposition
16.04.2002Despatch of communication that the patent will be maintained as amended
08.07.2002Fee for printing new specification paid
Appeal following opposition09.01.2001Appeal received No.  T0047/01
12.03.2001Statement of grounds filed
14.02.2002Result of appeal procedure: maintenance in amended form
14.02.2002Date of oral proceedings
21.02.2002Minutes of the oral proceedings despatched
Request for further processing for:02.04.1992Request for further processing filed
02.04.1992Full payment received (date of receipt of payment)
Request granted
16.04.1992Decision despatched
Fees paidRenewal fee
27.06.1991Renewal fee patent year 03
25.06.1992Renewal fee patent year 04
28.06.1993Renewal fee patent year 05
25.11.1994Renewal fee patent year 06
08.12.1995Renewal fee patent year 07
13.12.1996Renewal fee patent year 08
29.08.1997Renewal fee patent year 09
Penalty fee
Additional fee for renewal fee
30.06.199406   M06   Fee paid on   25.11.1994
30.06.199507   M06   Fee paid on   08.12.1995
30.06.199608   M06   Fee paid on   13.12.1996
30.06.199709   M06   Fee paid on   29.08.1997
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Lapses during opposition  TooltipAT19.06.2000
LU19.06.2000
SE20.06.2000
CH30.06.2000
LI30.06.2000
[2004/39]
Cited inInternational search[A]DE183112  ;
 [X]GB188002706  ;
 [A]US3111011  (BARLOW LESTER P);
 [X]FR1372024  (BERTIN & CIE);
 [A]US3250530  (DEAN LAWRENCE M, et al);
 [A]US3257815  (JACK BROCOFF, et al);
 [A]CA1057069  (ATKINSON FRANCIS C);
 [A]EP0004803  (PASQUIER ARMAND RENE [FR]);
 [A]WO8602936  (BUCCERI ALFIO);
 [A]FR2583811  (MAGNANI HELMUTH [FR]);
 [XP]US4790531  (MATSUI NOBUYUKI [JP], et al)
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.