Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0448173

EP0448173 - Liquid crystal display device [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusNo opposition filed within time limit
Status updated on  09.04.1999
Database last updated on 11.04.2026
Most recent event   Tooltip07.12.2007Lapse of the patent in a contracting statepublished on 09.01.2008  [2008/02]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Groenewoudseweg 1
5621 BA Eindhoven / NL
[N/P]
Former [1998/35]For all designated states
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Groenewoudseweg 1
5621 BA Eindhoven / NL
Former [1998/23]For all designated states
Philips Electronics N.V.
Groenewoudseweg 1
5621 BA Eindhoven / NL
Former [1991/39]For all designated states
Philips Electronics N.V.
Groenewoudseweg 1
NL-5621 BA Eindhoven / NL
Inventor(s)01 / Mulkens, Johannes Catharina Hubertus
c/o INT. OCTROOIBUREAU B.V. Prof. Holstlaan 6
NL-5656 AA Eindhoven / NL
02 / Heynderickx, Ingrid Emilienne Joanna Rita
c/o INT. OCTROOIBUREAU B.V. Prof. Holstlaan 6
NL-5656 AA Eindhoven / NL
[1991/39]
Representative(s)Raap, Adriaan Yde, et al
Philips Intellectual Property & Standards P.O. Box 220
5600 AE Eindhoven / NL
[N/P]
Former [1991/39]Raap, Adriaan Yde, et al
INTERNATIONAAL OCTROOIBUREAU B.V., Prof. Holstlaan 6
NL-5656 AA Eindhoven / NL
Application number, filing date91200611.120.03.1991
[1991/39]
Priority number, dateNL1990000068623.03.1990         Original published format: NL 9000686
[1991/39]
Filing languageNL
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP0448173
Date:25.09.1991
Language:EN
[1991/39]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP0448173
Date:03.06.1998
Language:EN
[1998/23]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP08.08.1991
ClassificationIPC:G02F1/137
[1991/39]
CPC:
G02F1/1396 (EP); G02F1/133531 (EP)
Designated contracting statesDE,   FR,   GB,   IT,   NL [1991/39]
TitleGerman:Flüssigkristall-Wiedergabeanordnung[1991/39]
English:Liquid crystal display device[1991/39]
French:Dispositif d'affichage à cristal liquide[1991/39]
Examination procedure24.03.1992Examination requested  [1992/22]
09.08.1993Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
22.11.1993Reply to a communication from the examining division
16.03.1994Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
22.06.1994Reply to a communication from the examining division
15.11.1994Despatch of communication that the application is refused, reason: substantive examination {1}
25.09.1997Despatch of communication of intention to grant (Approval: Yes)
12.11.1997Communication of intention to grant the patent
23.02.1998Fee for grant paid
23.02.1998Fee for publishing/printing paid
Appeal following examination12.12.1994Appeal received No.  T0982/94
12.12.1994Statement of grounds filed
16.09.1997Result of appeal procedure: remittal for grant
Opposition(s)04.03.1999No opposition filed within time limit [1999/21]
Fees paidRenewal fee
30.03.1993Renewal fee patent year 03
29.03.1994Renewal fee patent year 04
31.03.1995Renewal fee patent year 05
01.04.1996Renewal fee patent year 06
01.04.1997Renewal fee patent year 07
31.03.1998Renewal fee patent year 08
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Lapses during opposition  TooltipIT03.06.1998
NL03.06.1998
[2008/02]
Former [2003/07]IT03.06.1998
NL03.06.1998
Former [1999/42]IT03.06.1998
Documents cited:Search[AD] EP0264667  (HOFFMANN LA ROCHE et al.) [AD]
 [A] US4039252  (MIZUNO FUMIO et al.) [A]
 [A]   JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, vol. 48, no. 4, April 1977, pages 1426-1431, American Institute of Physics; M. GOSCIANSKI: "Optical characteristics of twisted nematic liquid crystals: Application to the improvement of the scanning capability in matrix displays" [A]
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.