blank Quick help
blank Maintenance news
blank News flashes
blank Related links

Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0510308

EP0510308 - Damping device for skis [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusOpposition rejected
Status updated on  16.01.1998
Database last updated on 05.04.2025
Most recent event   Tooltip11.07.2008Change - representativepublished on 13.08.2008  [2008/33]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
SALOMON S.A.
Metz-Tessy
74370 Pringy / FR
[N/P]
Inventor(s)01 / Phelipon, Axel
2 rue Grenette
F-74000 Annecy / FR
02 / Le Masson, Jacques
10 rue des Canotiers
F-74960 Cran-Gevrier / FR
[1992/44]
Representative(s)Altenburg, Udo, et al
Bardehle Pagenberg Partnerschaft mbB
Patentanwälte, Rechtsanwälte
Prinzregentenplatz 7
81675 München / DE
[N/P]
Application number, filing date92101946.906.02.1992
[1992/44]
Priority number, dateFR1991000542122.04.1991         Original published format: FR 9105421
[1992/44]
Filing languageFR
Procedural languageFR
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP0510308
Date:28.10.1992
Language:FR
[1992/44]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP0510308
Date:05.10.1994
Language:FR
[1994/40]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP13.05.1992
ClassificationIPC:A63C5/075
[1992/44]
CPC:
A63C5/075 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesAT,   CH,   DE,   LI [1992/44]
TitleGerman:Dämpfungsvorrichtung für Skier[1992/44]
English:Damping device for skis[1992/44]
French:Dispositif d'amortissement pour ski[1992/44]
Examination procedure10.04.1993Examination requested  [1993/24]
30.12.1993Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
01.02.1994Reply to a communication from the examining division
02.03.1994Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M02)
03.03.1994Reply to a communication from the examining division
22.03.1994Despatch of communication of intention to grant (Approval: Yes)
12.04.1994Communication of intention to grant the patent
21.06.1994Fee for grant paid
21.06.1994Fee for publishing/printing paid
Opposition(s)Opponent(s)01  30.06.1995  18.07.1995  ADMISSIBLE
Head Sport Aktiengesellschaft
Wuhrkopfweg 1
A-6921 Kennelbach / AT
Opponent's representative
Haffner, Thomas M.
Haffner und Keschmann
Patentanwälte KG
Schottengasse 3a
1014 Wien / AT
 02  05.07.1995  12.09.1995  ADMISSIBLE
Produktentwicklung & Gestaltung Dieter Mankau
Hauptstrasse 75
D-63928 Eichenbühl / DE
Opponent's representative
Chambosse, Hans-Joachim
Dr. jur. Rolf-S. Lehmpfuhl, Rechtsanwalt und Notar, Hans-Joachim Chambosse, Bockenheimer Landstrasse 63
60325 Frankfurt / DE
 [N/P]
13.07.1995No. 02: Notification indicating deficiencies in the notice of opposition
07.09.1995No. 02: Reply to notification indicating deficiencies in the notice of opposition
15.09.1995Invitation to proprietor to file observations on the notice of opposition
05.01.1996Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition
07.03.1996Despatch of a communication from the opposition division (Time limit: M02)
08.03.1996Reply to a communication from the opposition division
30.05.1996Date of oral proceedings
04.06.1996Despatch of minutes of oral proceedings
02.08.1996Date of despatch of rejection of opposition
16.10.1997Legal effect of rejection of opposition [1998/10]
Appeal following opposition29.09.1996Appeal received No.  T0880/96
29.09.1996Statement of grounds filed
16.10.1997Result of appeal procedure: appeal of the opponent was rejected
16.10.1997Date of oral proceedings
23.10.1997Minutes of the oral proceedings despatched
Fees paidRenewal fee
23.02.1994Renewal fee patent year 03
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search[A]FR1407710  ;
 [A]AT376571B  (PICHLER HUBERT [AT]);
 [X]WO8801189  (MANKAU DIETER [DE]);
 [A]FR2615404  (SALOMON SA [FR])
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.