blank Quick help
blank Maintenance news

Scheduled maintenance

Regular maintenance outages:
between 05.00 and 05.15 hrs CET (Monday to Sunday).

Other outages
Availability
Register Forum

2022.02.11

More...
blank News flashes

News flashes

New version of the European Patent Register - SPC information for Unitary Patents.

2024-03-06

More...
blank Related links

Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP1048025

EP1048025 - METHOD FOR OBJECTIVE VOICE QUALITY EVALUATION [Right-click to bookmark this link]
Former [2000/44]METHOD FOR INSTRUMENTAL VOICE QUALITY EVALUATION
[2003/04]
StatusNo opposition filed within time limit
Status updated on  10.09.2004
Database last updated on 26.06.2024
Most recent event   Tooltip28.03.2008Lapse of the patent in a contracting state
New state(s): IT, PT
published on 30.04.2008  [2008/18]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Deutsche Telekom AG
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 140
53113 Bonn / DE
[2000/44]
Inventor(s)01 / BERGER, Jens
Raabestrasse 8
D-10405 Berlin / DE
[2000/44]
Application number, filing date99942871.714.08.1999
[2000/44]
WO1999EP05972
Priority number, dateDE199814054827.08.1998         Original published format: DE 19840548
[2000/44]
Filing languageDE
Procedural languageDE
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report
No.:WO0013173
Date:09.03.2000
Language:DE
[2000/10]
Type: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP1048025
Date:02.11.2000
Language:DE
The application published by WIPO in one of the EPO official languages on 09.03.2000 takes the place of the publication of the European patent application.
[2000/44]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP1048025
Date:05.11.2003
Language:DE
[2003/45]
Search report(s)International search report - published on:EP09.03.2000
ClassificationIPC:G10L19/00
[2000/44]
CPC:
G10L25/69 (EP,US); G10L25/48 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesAT,   BE,   CH,   CY,   DE,   DK,   ES,   FI,   FR,   GB,   GR,   IE,   IT,   LI,   LU,   MC,   NL,   PT,   SE [2000/44]
TitleGerman:VERFAHREN ZUR INSTRUMENTELLEN SPRACHQUALITÄTSBESTIMMUNG[2000/44]
English:METHOD FOR OBJECTIVE VOICE QUALITY EVALUATION[2003/04]
French:PROCEDE DE DETERMINATION INSTRUMENTALE DE LA QUALITE VOCALE[2000/44]
Former [2000/44]METHOD FOR INSTRUMENTAL VOICE QUALITY EVALUATION
Entry into regional phase29.05.2000National basic fee paid 
11.09.2000Designation fee(s) paid 
11.09.2000Examination fee paid 
Examination procedure11.09.2000Examination requested  [2000/45]
01.04.2003Communication of intention to grant the patent
11.08.2003Fee for grant paid
11.08.2003Fee for publishing/printing paid
Opposition(s)06.08.2004No opposition filed within time limit [2004/44]
Fees paidRenewal fee
31.08.2001Renewal fee patent year 03
02.09.2002Renewal fee patent year 04
01.09.2003Renewal fee patent year 05
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Lapses during opposition  TooltipCY05.11.2003
FI05.11.2003
IE05.11.2003
IT05.11.2003
NL05.11.2003
DK05.02.2004
GR05.02.2004
SE05.02.2004
ES16.02.2004
PT05.04.2004
[2008/18]
Former [2007/23]CY05.11.2003
FI05.11.2003
IE05.11.2003
NL05.11.2003
DK05.02.2004
GR05.02.2004
SE05.02.2004
ES16.02.2004
Former [2004/46]FI05.11.2003
IE05.11.2003
NL05.11.2003
DK05.02.2004
GR05.02.2004
SE05.02.2004
ES16.02.2004
Former [2004/41]FI05.11.2003
IE05.11.2003
NL05.11.2003
DK05.02.2004
GR05.02.2004
SE05.02.2004
Former [2004/40]FI05.11.2003
IE05.11.2003
NL05.11.2003
GR05.02.2004
SE05.02.2004
Former [2004/33]FI05.11.2003
NL05.11.2003
GR05.02.2004
SE05.02.2004
Former [2004/26]FI05.11.2003
SE05.02.2004
Former [2004/24]SE05.02.2004
Cited inInternational search[A]US5621854  (HOLLIER MICHAEL P [GB]) [A] 1-6 * column 5, line 21 - column 6, line 4 * * column 6, line 62 - column 7, line 14 ** column 8, line 38 - line 55 *
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.