EP1761890 - A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYSING RISK ASSOCIATED WITH AN INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO [Right-click to bookmark this link] | Status | The application has been refused Status updated on 30.03.2018 Database last updated on 02.11.2024 | Most recent event Tooltip | 30.03.2018 | Refusal of application | published on 02.05.2018 [2018/18] | Applicant(s) | For all designated states Transcon Securities PTY, Ltd. 007 184 983 Level 43, Nauru House 80 Collins Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000 / AU | [2007/11] | Inventor(s) | 01 /
SALTER, Geoffrey, Gordon 61 Park Street South Yarra, Victoria 3141 / AU | [2007/11] | Representative(s) | Lloyd, Patrick Alexander Desmond Reddie & Grose LLP The White Chapel Building 10 Whitechapel High Street London E1 8QS / GB | [N/P] |
Former [2007/11] | Lloyd, Patrick Alexander Desmond Reddie & Grose 16 Theobalds Road London WC1X 8PL / GB | Application number, filing date | 05744845.8 | 01.06.2005 | [2007/11] | WO2005AU00776 | Priority number, date | AU20040903030 | 01.06.2004 Original published format: AU 2004903030 | AU20040903240 | 11.06.2004 Original published format: AU 2004903240 | [2007/11] | Filing language | EN | Procedural language | EN | Publication | Type: | A1 Application with search report | No.: | WO2005119534 | Date: | 15.12.2005 | Language: | EN | [2005/50] | Type: | A1 Application with search report | No.: | EP1761890 | Date: | 14.03.2007 | Language: | EN | The application published by WIPO in one of the EPO official languages on 15.12.2005 takes the place of the publication of the European patent application. | [2007/11] | Search report(s) | International search report - published on: | AU | 15.12.2005 | (Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on: | EP | 03.07.2009 | Classification | IPC: | G06Q40/00 | [2009/32] | CPC: |
G06Q40/06 (EP,US);
G06F3/0482 (US);
G06F3/0484 (US);
G06Q10/04 (US);
G06Q40/08 (EP,US)
|
Former IPC [2007/11] | G06Q10/00 | Designated contracting states | AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LI, LT, LU, MC, NL, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK, TR [2007/11] | Extension states | AL | Not yet paid | BA | Not yet paid | HR | Not yet paid | LV | Not yet paid | MK | Not yet paid | YU | Not yet paid | Title | German: | SYSTEM UND VERFAHREN ZUM ANALYSIEREN VON MIT EINEM INVESTITIONS-PORTFOLIO VERBUNDENEM RISIKO | [2007/11] | English: | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYSING RISK ASSOCIATED WITH AN INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO | [2007/11] | French: | SYSTEME ET PROCEDE PERMETTANT D'ANALYSER LE RISQUE ASSOCIE A UN PORTEFEUILLE D'INVESTISSEMENTS | [2007/11] | Entry into regional phase | 28.12.2006 | National basic fee paid | 28.12.2006 | Search fee paid | 28.12.2006 | Designation fee(s) paid | 28.12.2006 | Examination fee paid | Examination procedure | 28.12.2006 | Examination requested [2007/11] | 26.02.2007 | Amendment by applicant (claims and/or description) | 08.12.2009 | Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06) | 27.07.2010 | Despatch of communication that the application is deemed to be withdrawn, reason: reply to the communication from the examining division not received in time | 06.10.2010 | Reply to a communication from the examining division | 28.11.2017 | Cancellation of oral proceeding that was planned for 07.12.2017 | 07.12.2017 | Date of oral proceedings (cancelled) | 11.12.2017 | Despatch of communication that the application is refused, reason: substantive examination [2018/18] | 21.12.2017 | Application refused, date of legal effect [2018/18] | Divisional application(s) | The date of the Examining Division's first communication in respect of the earliest application for which a communication has been issued is 08.12.2009 | Request for further processing for: | The application is deemed to be withdrawn due to failure to reply to the examination report | 06.10.2010 | Request for further processing filed | 06.10.2010 | Full payment received (date of receipt of payment) Request granted | 20.10.2010 | Decision despatched | Fees paid | Renewal fee | 28.12.2006 | Renewal fee patent year 03 | 12.11.2008 | Renewal fee patent year 04 | 16.06.2009 | Renewal fee patent year 05 | 11.06.2010 | Renewal fee patent year 06 | 13.06.2011 | Renewal fee patent year 07 | 14.06.2012 | Renewal fee patent year 08 | 10.06.2013 | Renewal fee patent year 09 | 31.03.2014 | Renewal fee patent year 10 | 10.06.2015 | Renewal fee patent year 11 | 10.06.2016 | Renewal fee patent year 12 | 26.06.2017 | Renewal fee patent year 13 | Penalty fee | Additional fee for renewal fee | 30.06.2008 | 04   M06   Fee paid on   12.11.2008 |
Opt-out from the exclusive Tooltip competence of the Unified Patent Court | See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data | ||
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court. | Documents cited: | Search | [L] - "STATEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTICE FROM THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE DATED 1 OCTOBER 2007 CONCERNING BUSINESS METHODS - EPC / ERKLAERUNG GEMAESS DER MITTEILUNG DES EUROPAEISCHEN PATENTAMTS VOM 1.OKTOBER 2007 UEBER GESCHAEFTSMETHODEN - EPU / DECLARATION CONFORMEMENT AU COMMUNIQUE DE L'OFFICE EUROP", JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS.OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE.AMTSBLATTT DES EUROPAEISCHEN PATENTAMTS, OEB, MUNCHEN, DE, (20071101), ISSN 0170-9291, pages 592 - 593, XP002456252 [L] 1-28 * Statement in accordance with the Notice from the European Patent Office dated 1 October 2007 concerning business methods(OJ 11/2007; p592-593) The claimed subject matter, with due regard to the description and drawings, relates to processes comprised in the list of subject matter and activities excluded from patentability under Art.52(2) and (3) EPC. The applicant is advised that in accordance with the established practice of the EPO, no search need be performed in respect of those aspects of the claimed invention. The only identifiable technical aspects of the claimed invention relate to the use of conventional, general-purpose data processing technology for processing data of an inherently non-technical nature. The information technology employed is considered to have been generally known as it was widely available to everyone at the date of filing/priority of the present application. The notoriety of such prior art cannot reasonably be contested. No documentary evidence was therefore considered required. * | International search | [X]WO0143037 (OPTIMIZEUSA COM [US], et al); | [X]US2002152151 (BAUGHMAN WILLIAM [US], et al); | [X]US2003172018 (CHEN PENG [US], et al); | [X]WO03096253 (UBS PAINEWEBBER INC [US]) |