blank Quick help
blank Maintenance news

Scheduled maintenance

Regular maintenance outages:
between 05.00 and 05.15 hrs CET (Monday to Sunday).

Other outages
Availability

2022.02.11

More...
blank News flashes

News Flashes

New version of the European Patent Register – SPC proceedings information in the Unitary Patent Register.

2024-07-24

More...
blank Related links

Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP1708108

EP1708108 - Improvements in or relating to quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) for the case of missing fragments [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusNo opposition filed within time limit
Status updated on  09.07.2010
Database last updated on 02.11.2024
Most recent event   Tooltip19.10.2012Lapse of the patent in a contracting state
New state(s): TR
published on 21.11.2012  [2012/47]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
ID Business Solutions Ltd.
1st Floor, 2 Occam Court The Surrey Research Park Guildford
Surrey GU2 7QB / GB
[2009/30]
Former [2006/40]For all designated states
ID Business Solutions Ltd.
1 Occam Court The Surrey Research Park Guildford
Surrey GU2 5QB / GB
Inventor(s)01 / Kolossov, Evgueni
17 Larchfield Road
Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 2RZ / GB
02 / Stanforth, Robert
The Oaks Barhatch Road
Cranleigh Surrey GU6 7DJ / GB
 [2006/40]
Representative(s)Anderson, Angela Mary
Murgitroyd & Company
Immeuble Atlantis
55 Allée Pierre Ziller
Sophia Antipolis
06560 Valbonne / FR
[N/P]
Former [2006/40]Anderson, Angela Mary
MURGITROYD & COMPANY Immeuble Atlantis 55 Allée Pierre Ziller 06560 Valbonne
Sophia Antipolis / FR
Application number, filing date06005156.214.03.2006
[2006/40]
Priority number, dateGB2005000636630.03.2005         Original published format: GB 0506366
[2006/40]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP1708108
Date:04.10.2006
Language:EN
[2006/40]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP1708108
Date:02.09.2009
Language:EN
[2009/36]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP30.05.2006
ClassificationIPC:G06F17/50
[2006/40]
CPC:
G16C20/30 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesAT,   BE,   BG,   CH,   CY,   CZ,   DE,   DK,   EE,   ES,   FI,   FR,   GB,   GR,   HU,   IE,   IS,   IT,   LI,   LT,   LU,   LV,   MC,   NL,   PL,   PT,   RO,   SE,   SI,   SK,   TR [2006/40]
TitleGerman:Verbesserungen in der Formulierung von quantitativen Struktur-Aktivitäts-Beziehungen (QSAR) im Falle fehlender Fragmente[2006/40]
English:Improvements in or relating to quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) for the case of missing fragments[2006/40]
French:Améliorations de construction des relations quantitatives structure-activité (RQSA) en cas de fragments manquants[2006/40]
Examination procedure26.09.2006Examination requested  [2006/45]
13.11.2006Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
20.02.2007Reply to a communication from the examining division
13.03.2009Communication of intention to grant the patent
09.06.2009Fee for grant paid
09.06.2009Fee for publishing/printing paid
Opposition(s)03.06.2010No opposition filed within time limit [2010/32]
Fees paidRenewal fee
10.03.2008Renewal fee patent year 03
06.03.2009Renewal fee patent year 04
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Lapses during opposition  TooltipAT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
BG02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
IT02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
TR02.09.2009
GR03.12.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
HU03.03.2010
IE14.03.2010
LU14.03.2010
MC31.03.2010
[2012/47]
Former [2012/43]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
BG02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
IT02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
GR03.12.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
HU03.03.2010
IE14.03.2010
LU14.03.2010
MC31.03.2010
Former [2012/42]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
BG02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
IT02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
GR03.12.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
HU03.03.2010
IE14.03.2010
MC31.03.2010
Former [2012/41]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
BG02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
IT02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
GR03.12.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
IE14.03.2010
MC31.03.2010
Former [2011/16]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
IT02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
GR03.12.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
IE14.03.2010
MC31.03.2010
Former [2011/08]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
GR03.12.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
IE14.03.2010
MC31.03.2010
Former [2011/02]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
GR03.12.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
MC31.03.2010
Former [2010/40]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
DK02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
Former [2010/30]AT02.09.2009
BE02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
Former [2010/28]BE02.09.2009
CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
Former [2010/25]CY02.09.2009
CZ02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
RO02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
SK02.09.2009
ES13.12.2009
IS02.01.2010
PT04.01.2010
Former [2010/20]CY02.09.2009
EE02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
ES13.12.2009
Former [2010/19]CY02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
ES13.12.2009
Former [2010/16]CY02.09.2009
FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
Former [2010/13]FI02.09.2009
LT02.09.2009
LV02.09.2009
NL02.09.2009
PL02.09.2009
SE02.09.2009
SI02.09.2009
Documents cited:Search[A]US6036349  (GOMBAR VIJAY K [US]) [A] 1,9 * column 1, paragraphs 3-5 * * column 2, paragraph 1 *;
 [XP]  - E. KOLOSSOV, R. STANFORTH, "Assessment of Domain of Applicability for the Fragment-based QSAR Models", POSTER AT: UK QSAR AND CHEMOINFORMATICS SPRING MEETING, (20050413), XP001247035 [XP] 1-11 * the whole document *
 [XP]  - EVGUENI KOLOSSOV, "The Quality of QSAR Models: Myth and Reality", PRESENTATION AT: UK QSAR AND CHEMOINFORMATICS SPRING MEETING, (20050413), XP002380041 [XP] 1-11 * the whole document *
 [A]  - GUHA RAJARSHI ET AL, "Determining the validity of a QSAR model - A classification approach", J. CHEM. INF. MODEL.; JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2005, (200411), vol. 45, no. 1, pages 65 - 73, XP002380042 [A] 1,9 * page 67, 68, section: CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY *
 [A]  - SHERIDAN ROBERT P ET AL, "Similarity to molecules in the training set is a good discriminator for prediction accuracy in QSAR", J. CHEM. INF. COMPUT. SCI.; JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2004, (200411), vol. 44, no. 6, pages 1912 - 1928, XP002380043 [A] 1,9 * the whole document *

DOI:   http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci049782w
 [A]  - W. LINDBERG, J-A. PERSSON, "Partial Least-Squares Method for Spectrofluorimetric Analysis of Mixtures of Humic Acis and Ligninsulfonate", ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, (1983), vol. 55, no. 4, pages 643 - 648, XP002380044 [A] 1,3,9,11 * section: Mathematical Methods" *

DOI:   http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a014
 [A]  - MANDEL JOHN, "REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF COLLINEAR DATA", J RES NATL BUR STAND (US) NOV-DEC 1985, (19850520), vol. 90, no. 6, XP002380045 [A] 1,9 * section: Establishing the EPD *
 [A]  - ALEXANDER TROPSHA, PAOLA GRAMATICA , VIJAY K. GOMBAR, "The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models", QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, (200304), vol. 22, no. 1, pages 69 - 77, XP002380046 [A] 1,9 * sections 2.2, 3.5 *

DOI:   http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200390007
 [A]  - NFW EL TAYAR, HFW KARAJIANNIS, HFW WATERBEEMD, "Structure-lipophilicity relationships of peptides and peptidomimetics", AMINO ACIDS, (1995), vol. 8, pages 125 - 139, XP009066055 [A] 1,9 * page 127, paragraph 2 *

DOI:   http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00806487
 [A]  - D. B. KITCHEN; F. L. STAHURA; J. BAJORATH, "Computational Techniques for Diversity Analysis and Compound Classification", MINI REVIEWS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, (200412), vol. 4, no. 10, pages 1029 - 1039, XP009066112 [A] 4,10 * table 2 *
 [A]  - C. AUER, M. COMBER, JOANNA S. JAWORSKA, C.J. VAN LEEUWEN, "Summary of a Workshop on Regulatory Acceptance of (Q)SARs for Human Health and Environmental Endpoints", ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, (200308), vol. 111, no. 10, pages 1358 - 1360, XP002380049 [A] 1,9 * the whole document *
 [A]  - N NIKOLOVA, J JAWORSKA, "Approaches to measure chemical similarity: a review", QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, (2003), vol. 22, no. 9,10, pages 1006 - 1026, XP002380050 [A] 1,9 * section 2, 3 *

DOI:   http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200330831
by applicant   - R.S SHERIDAN ET AL., "Similarity of molecules in the training set is a good discriminator for prediction accuracy in QSAR", J. CHEM. INF. COMPUT.SCI., (2004), no. 44, doi:doi:10.1021/ci049782w, pages 1912 - 1928, XP002380043

DOI:   http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci049782w
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.