Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP2046061

EP2046061 - Real-time video transmission system [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusThe application has been refused
Status updated on  23.11.2018
Database last updated on 30.03.2026
Most recent event   Tooltip23.11.2018Refusal of applicationpublished on 26.12.2018  [2018/52]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Microchip Technology Germany GmbH
Friedrichshafener Str. 3
82205 Gilching / DE
[2014/52]
Former [2014/50]For all designated states
Microchip Technology Germany GmbH
Friedrichshafener 3
82205 Gilching / DE
Former [2009/15]For all designated states
SMSC Europe GmbH
Bannwaldallee 48
76185 Karlsruhe / DE
Inventor(s)01 / Knapp, David
62 Pascal Lane
Austin, 78746 / US
02 / Miller, Martin
Kaiserallee 54
76185, Karlsruhe / DE
03 / Zhang, Wen
Anne-Frank-Strasse 13
64295, Darmstadt / DE
 [2009/15]
Representative(s)Lohr, Georg
Lohr, Jöstingmeier & Partner
Patent- und Rechtsanwälte
Junkersstraße 3
82178 Puchheim / DE
[N/P]
Former [2009/15]Lohr, Georg
Lohr, Jöstingmeier & Partner Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Junkersstrasse 3
82178 Puchheim / DE
Application number, filing date07117895.804.10.2007
[2009/15]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP2046061
Date:08.04.2009
Language:EN
[2009/15]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP17.03.2008
ClassificationIPC:H04N7/52
[2009/15]
CPC:
H04N21/23602 (EP,US); H04N7/24 (KR); H03M7/30 (KR);
H04L12/28 (KR); H04N21/2383 (EP,US); H04N21/242 (EP,US);
H04N21/4342 (EP,US); H04N21/647 (EP,US); H04N21/64792 (EP,US);
H04J3/0626 (US) (-)
Designated contracting statesAT,   BE,   BG,   CH,   CY,   CZ,   DE,   DK,   EE,   ES,   FI,   FR,   GB,   GR,   HU,   IE,   IS,   IT,   LI,   LT,   LU,   LV,   MC,   MT,   NL,   PL,   PT,   RO,   SE,   SI,   SK,   TR [2009/15]
TitleGerman:System für Videoübertragung in Echtzeit[2009/15]
English:Real-time video transmission system[2009/15]
French:Système de transmission vidéo en temps réel[2009/15]
Examination procedure08.10.2009Examination requested  [2009/47]
03.11.2009Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
18.12.2009Reply to a communication from the examining division
27.05.2010Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
27.09.2010Reply to a communication from the examining division
19.01.2012Date of oral proceedings
02.02.2012Minutes of oral proceedings despatched
18.05.2012Despatch of communication that the application is refused, reason: substantive examination [2018/52]
19.03.2018Application refused, date of legal effect [2018/52]
Appeal following examination06.06.2012Appeal received No.  T2275/12
14.09.2012Statement of grounds filed
19.03.2018Result of appeal procedure: appeal of the applicant withdrawn
Divisional application(s)EP14182138.9  / EP2822284
The date of the Examining Division's first communication in respect of the earliest application for which a communication has been issued is  03.11.2009
Fees paidRenewal fee
22.10.2009Renewal fee patent year 03
02.11.2010Renewal fee patent year 04
19.10.2011Renewal fee patent year 05
24.10.2012Renewal fee patent year 06
28.10.2013Renewal fee patent year 07
27.10.2014Renewal fee patent year 08
27.10.2015Renewal fee patent year 09
27.10.2016Renewal fee patent year 10
23.10.2017Renewal fee patent year 11
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search[X] US6611537  (EDENS GLENN T et al.) [X] 1-22 * column 9, line 46 - line 54 * * column 26, line 34 - line 47 * * column 27, line 1 - line 5 * * column 45, line 35 - line 45 * * column 57, line 3 - line 32 * * column 58, line 58 - line 63 * * column 100, line 25 - line 40 * * column 100, line 55 - line 61 *
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.