EP0180796 - Method of cristallisation by cooling [Right-click to bookmark this link] | Status | The application is deemed to be withdrawn Status updated on 21.11.1988 Database last updated on 24.08.2024 | Most recent event Tooltip | 07.07.2007 | Change - inventor | published on 08.08.2007 [2007/32] | Applicant(s) | For all designated states Hugo Petersen Ges. für verfahrenstechn. Anlagenbau mbH & Co KG Postfach 4640 65036 Wiesbaden / DE | [N/P] |
Former [1986/20] | For all designated states Hugo Petersen Ges. für verfahrenstechn. Anlagenbau mbH & Co KG Postfach 4640 D-65036 Wiesbaden / DE | Inventor(s) | 01 /
Seipenbusch, Jürgen, Dipl.-Ing. Mendelssohn-Bartholdy-Strasse 12 D-6200 Wiesbaden / DE | [1986/20] | Application number, filing date | 85112778.7 | 09.10.1985 | [1986/20] | Priority number, date | DE19843440294 | 05.11.1984 Original published format: DE 3440294 | [1986/20] | Filing language | DE | Procedural language | DE | Publication | Type: | A2 Application without search report | No.: | EP0180796 | Date: | 14.05.1986 | Language: | DE | [1986/20] | Classification | IPC: | B01D9/00 | [1986/20] | CPC: |
B01D9/0009 (EP)
| Designated contracting states | AT, BE, CH, DE, FR, GB, IT, LI, LU, NL, SE [1986/20] | Title | German: | Verfahren zur Kühlkristallisation | [1986/20] | English: | Method of cristallisation by cooling | [1986/20] | French: | Procédé de cristallisation par refroidissement | [1986/20] | File destroyed: | 11.08.1994 | Examination procedure | 02.11.1987 | Application deemed to be withdrawn, date of legal effect [1989/02] | 27.05.1988 | Despatch of communication that the application is deemed to be withdrawn, reason: renewal fee not paid in time [1989/02] | Fees paid | Penalty fee | Additional fee for renewal fee | 02.11.1987 | 03   M06   Not yet paid |
Opt-out from the exclusive Tooltip competence of the Unified Patent Court | See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data | ||
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court. |