Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0405243

EP0405243 - Agricultural field sprayer [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusOpposition rejected
Status updated on  08.06.1995
Database last updated on 18.03.2026
Most recent event   Tooltip08.06.1995Opposition rejectedpublished on 26.07.1995 [1995/30]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer GmbH & Co. KG
Am Amazonenwerk 9-13
49205 Hasbergen / DE
[N/P]
Former [1991/01]For all designated states
Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer GmbH & Co. KG
Am Amazonenwerk 9-13
D-49205 Hasbergen / DE
Inventor(s)01 / Oberheide, Friedich
Kiefernweg 15
D-4507 Hasbergen / DE
[1991/01]
Representative(s)Smulders, Theodorus A.H.J., et al
Vereenigde Postbus 87930
2508 DH Den Haag / NL
[N/P]
Former [1994/15]Smulders, Theodorus A.H.J., Ir., et al
Vereenigde Octrooibureaux Nieuwe Parklaan 97
NL-2587 BN 's-Gravenhage / NL
Application number, filing date90111277.115.06.1990
[1991/01]
Priority number, dateDE1989392108728.06.1989         Original published format: DE 3921087
[1991/01]
Filing languageDE
Procedural languageDE
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP0405243
Date:02.01.1991
Language:DE
[1991/01]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP0405243
Date:07.10.1992
Language:DE
[1992/41]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP18.10.1990
ClassificationIPC:A01M7/00
[1991/01]
CPC:
A01M7/0085 (EP)
Designated contracting statesDE,   DK,   FR,   GB,   NL [1991/01]
TitleGerman:Landwirtschaftliche Feldspritze[1991/01]
English:Agricultural field sprayer[1991/01]
French:Pulvérisateur agricole pour cultures de plein champ[1991/01]
Examination procedure15.01.1991Examination requested  [1991/11]
02.07.1991Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
30.08.1991Reply to a communication from the examining division
11.10.1991Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
06.12.1991Reply to a communication from the examining division
02.03.1992Despatch of communication of intention to grant (Approval: Yes)
23.03.1992Communication of intention to grant the patent
09.06.1992Fee for grant paid
09.06.1992Fee for publishing/printing paid
Opposition(s)Opponent(s)01  07.07.1993  05.10.1993  ADMISSIBLE
GREENLAND N.V.
Hoofdweg 1278
NL-2153 LR Nieuw-Vennep / NL
Opponent's representative
Hoorweg, Petrus Nicolaas, et al, et al
Arnold & Siedsma
Bezuidenhoutseweg 57
2594 AC The Hague / NL
 [N/P]
Former [1993/36]
Opponent(s)01  07.07.1993  05.10.1993  ADMISSIBLE
GREENLAND N.V.
Hoofdweg 1278
NL-2153 LR Nieuw-Vennep / NL
Opponent's representative
Hoorweg, Petrus Nicolaas, et al, et al
Arnold & Siedsma, Advocaten en Octrooigemachtigden, Sweelinkplein 1
NL-2517 GK Den Haag / NL
23.08.1993No. 01: Notification indicating deficiencies in the notice of opposition
28.09.1993No. 01: Reply to notification indicating deficiencies in the notice of opposition
11.10.1993Invitation to proprietor to file observations on the notice of opposition
11.02.1994Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition
01.12.1994Legal effect of rejection of opposition [1995/30]
01.12.1994Date of oral proceedings
02.03.1995Despatch of minutes of oral proceedings
02.03.1995Date of despatch of rejection of opposition
Fees paidRenewal fee
19.06.1992Renewal fee patent year 03
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search[XP]   LANDBOUW MECHANISATIE. vol. 40, no. 12, Dezember 1989, WAGENINGEN NL Seiten 16 - 19; "DE NIEUWE DOUVEN VELDSPUITEN" [XP]
 [A]   LANDTECHNIK. vol. 43, no. 1, Januar 1988, HANNOVER DE Seiten 46 - 48; H.OSTARHILD: "PLANZENSCHUTZTECHNIK: SEHR BREITES ANGEBOT MIT ZAHLREICHEN DETAILVERBESSERUNGEN" [A]
Examination  Prospekt der Firma DOUVEN: "Fortschrittliche Spritztechnik ist kostensparend und umweltschonend" [XP]
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.