Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0550255

EP0550255 - Transistor spacer structure [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusNo opposition filed within time limit
Status updated on  15.01.1999
Database last updated on 28.03.2026
Most recent event   Tooltip15.01.1999No opposition filed within time limitpublished on 03.03.1999 [1999/09]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
STMicroelectronics, Inc.
1310 Electronics Drive
Carrollton, TX 75006-5039 / US
[1999/08]
Former [1993/27]For all designated states
SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS, INC.
1310 Electronics Drive
Carrollton Texas 75006 / US
Inventor(s)01 / Chen, Fusen E.
18175 Midway Road No.227
Dallas, Texas 75287 / US
02 / Bryant, Frank Randolph
2125 Crestwood
Denton, Texas 76201 / US
03 / Dixit, Girish Anant
18175 Midway Road, No.159
Dallas, Texas 75287 / US
[1993/27]
Representative(s)Palmer, Roger, et al
PAGE, WHITE & FARRER 54 Doughty Street
London WC1N 2LS / GB
[1993/27]
Application number, filing date92311751.923.12.1992
[1993/27]
Priority number, dateUS1991081662731.12.1991         Original published format: US 816627
[1993/27]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A2 Application without search report 
No.:EP0550255
Date:07.07.1993
Language:EN
[1993/27]
Type: A3 Search report 
No.:EP0550255
Date:25.08.1993
Language:EN
[1993/34]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP0550255
Date:11.03.1998
Language:EN
[1998/11]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP05.07.1993
ClassificationIPC:H01L21/336, H01L21/28
[1993/27]
CPC:
H10D30/0227 (EP,US); H10D64/021 (EP,US); H10P30/22 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesDE,   FR,   GB,   IT [1993/27]
TitleGerman:Seitenwand-Abstandsstruktur für Feldeffekttransistor[1993/27]
English:Transistor spacer structure[1993/27]
French:Structure de parois d'espacement pour transistor à effet de champ[1993/27]
Examination procedure27.01.1994Examination requested  [1994/13]
07.03.1994Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06)
21.10.1994Despatch of communication that the application is deemed to be withdrawn, reason: reply to the communication from the examining division not received in time
03.12.1994Reply to a communication from the examining division
13.11.1995Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
07.03.1996Reply to a communication from the examining division
28.04.1997Despatch of communication of intention to grant (Approval: Yes)
18.06.1997Communication of intention to grant the patent
23.08.1997Fee for grant paid
23.08.1997Fee for publishing/printing paid
Opposition(s)12.12.1998No opposition filed within time limit [1999/09]
Request for further processing for:03.12.1994Request for further processing filed
03.12.1994Full payment received (date of receipt of payment)
Request granted
20.12.1994Decision despatched
Fees paidRenewal fee
10.12.1994Renewal fee patent year 03
21.12.1995Renewal fee patent year 04
13.12.1996Renewal fee patent year 05
22.12.1997Renewal fee patent year 06
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search[X]   IBM TECHNICAL DISCLOSURE BULLETIN. vol. 26, no. 3B, August 1983, NEW YORK US pages 1316 - 1317 J.M. BLUM ET AL. 'SIDEWALL OXIDE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR POLYSILICON GATE DEVICES TO MINIMIZE CONSUMPTION OF FIELD OXIDE' [X]
 [X]   IBM TECHNICAL DISCLOSURE BULLETIN. vol. 24, no. 2, July 1981, NEW YORK US pages 1293 - 1295 P.J. TSANG 'Method to improve the controllability of lightly doped drain SiO2 spacer formation' [X]
 [X]   IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS. vol. 10, no. 11, November 1989, NEW YORK US pages 487 - 489 CHIH-YUAN LU ET AL. 'Submicrometer salicide CMOS devices with self-aligned shallow/deep junctions' [X]
 [A]   IBM TECHNICAL DISCLOSURE BULLETIN. vol. 32, no. 8A, January 1990, NEW YORK US pages 312 - 313 'Method to minimize junction capacitance added by a punch-through (halo) implant' [A]
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.