Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0621085

EP0621085 - Microprocessor system controller for mail processing system applications [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusPatent maintained as amended
Status updated on  26.12.2008
Database last updated on 28.03.2026
Most recent event   Tooltip07.10.2011Lapse of the patent in a contracting statepublished on 09.11.2011  [2011/45]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Pitney Bowes Inc.
World Headquarters One Elmcroft Road
Stamford, CT 06926-0700 / US
[N/P]
Former [2009/05]For all designated states
PITNEY BOWES INC.
World Headquarters One Elmcroft Road
Stamford, CT 06926-0700 / US
Former [1994/43]For all designated states
PITNEY BOWES INC.
World Headquarters One Elmcroft
Stamford Connecticut 06926-0700 / US
Inventor(s)01 / Digiulio, Peter C.
112 Morehouse Street
Bridgeport, CT 06605 / US
02 / Salazar, Edilberto I.
116 Pocono Road
Brookfield, CT 06804 / US
03 / Bergman, Norman J.
17 Ole Musket Lane
Danbury, CT 06810 / US
04 / Ramirez, Frank D.
60 Lawn Avenue No. 24
Stamford, CT 06902 / US
[1994/43]
Representative(s)Frank, Veit Peter, et al
Hoffmann - Eitle
ATTENTION : ADDRESS INACTIVE - USE ASS-NR - CDR / DE
[N/P]
Former [1996/38]Frank, Veit Peter, Dipl.-Ing., et al
Hoffmann, Eitle & Partner Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Arabellastrasse 4
81925 München / DE
Former [1994/43]Cook, Anthony John, et al
D. YOUNG & CO. 21 New Fetter Lane
London EC4A 1DA / GB
Application number, filing date94201132.110.11.1989
[1994/43]
Priority number, dateUS1988028135508.12.1988         Original published format: US 281355
[1994/43]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP0621085
Date:26.10.1994
Language:EN
[1994/43]
Type: B1 Patent specification 
No.:EP0621085
Date:06.03.2002
Language:EN
[2002/10]
Type: B2 New European patent specification 
No.:EP0621085
Date:28.01.2009
Language:EN
[2009/05]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP16.08.1994
ClassificationIPC:B07C1/00
[1994/43]
CPC:
B07C1/00 (EP,US); G07B17/00467 (EP,US); G07B17/00661 (EP,US);
G07B2017/00491 (EP,US); G07B2017/00669 (EP,US); G07B2017/00677 (EP,US);
G07B2017/00685 (EP,US) (-)
Designated contracting statesBE,   CH,   DE,   FR,   GB,   IT,   LI,   NL,   SE [1994/43]
TitleGerman:Mikroprozessorsystem-Steuervorrichtung zur Anwendung in einem Postverarbeitungssystem[1994/43]
English:Microprocessor system controller for mail processing system applications[1994/43]
French:Dispositif de commande d'un système à microprocesseur appliqué à un système de traitement de courrier[1994/43]
Examination procedure25.04.1994Examination requested  [1994/43]
25.09.1996Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
05.02.1997Reply to a communication from the examining division
29.08.1997Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06)
16.09.1997Reply to a communication from the examining division
27.04.1998Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
04.09.1998Reply to a communication from the examining division
02.09.1999Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
19.10.1999Reply to a communication from the examining division
09.01.2001Despatch of communication of intention to grant (Approval: Yes)
31.05.2001Communication of intention to grant the patent
29.08.2001Fee for grant paid
29.08.2001Fee for publishing/printing paid
Parent application(s)   TooltipEP89311654.1  / EP0372726
Opposition(s)Opponent(s)01  06.12.2002    ADMISSIBLE
Francotyp-Postalia GmbH
Triftweg 21-26
D-16547 Birkenwerder / DE
Opponent's representative
Schaumburg, Karl-Heinz
Schaumburg, Thoenes, Thurn, Landskron, Eckert
Patentanwälte
Postfach 86 07 48
81634 München / DE
 [N/P]
Former [2003/17]
Opponent(s)01  06.12.2002    ADMISSIBLE
Francotyp-Postalia GmbH
Triftweg 21-26
D-16547 Birkenwerder / DE
Opponent's representative
Schaumburg, Karl-Heinz
Patentanwälte Schaumburg, Thoenes, Thurn, Postfach 86 07 48
81634 München / DE
Deletion: No opposition filed within time limit [ N /P ]
09.12.2002No opposition filed within time limit [2003/09]
17.03.2003Invitation to proprietor to file observations on the notice of opposition
05.09.2003Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition
25.07.2004Despatch of a communication from the opposition division (Time limit: M04)
23.12.2004Reply to a communication from the opposition division
09.08.2005Despatch of a communication from the opposition division (Time limit: M02)
10.10.2005Reply to a communication from the opposition division
10.04.2006Despatch of a communication from the opposition division (Time limit: M04)
22.08.2006Reply to a communication from the opposition division
05.10.2007Despatch of interlocutory decision in opposition
15.10.2007Legal effect of interlocutory decision in opposition
29.05.2008Despatch of communication that the patent will be maintained as amended
05.09.2008Fee for printing new specification paid
Fees paidRenewal fee
25.04.1994Renewal fee patent year 03
25.04.1994Renewal fee patent year 04
25.04.1994Renewal fee patent year 05
31.10.1994Renewal fee patent year 06
30.10.1995Renewal fee patent year 07
28.10.1996Renewal fee patent year 08
29.10.1997Renewal fee patent year 09
22.10.1998Renewal fee patent year 10
21.10.1999Renewal fee patent year 11
20.10.2000Renewal fee patent year 12
22.11.2001Renewal fee patent year 13
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Lapses during opposition  TooltipNL06.03.2002
[2011/45]
Former [2010/31]NL06.03.2002
Former [2010/05]NL06.03.2002
Cited inExamination  Mikroelektronik fr Einsteiger, VDI-Verlag 1983, pp.168-171; INTEL Microprocessor and peripheral Handbook, Vol I-Microprocessor 1987, pp.1-2,1-3,3-1,4-1.
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.