Extract from the Register of European Patents

EP About this file: EP0989558

EP0989558 - System and method for data error recovery [Right-click to bookmark this link]
StatusThe application has been refused
Status updated on  15.05.2009
Database last updated on 28.03.2026
Most recent event   Tooltip15.05.2009Refusal of applicationpublished on 17.06.2009  [2009/25]
Applicant(s)For all designated states
Hewlett-Packard Company
3000 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304 / US
[N/P]
Former [2001/18]For all designated states
Hewlett-Packard Company, A Delaware Corporation
3000 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304 / US
Former [2000/13]For all designated states
Hewlett-Packard Company
3000 Hanover Street, M/S 20BN
Palo Alto, CA 94304 / US
Inventor(s)01 / Taugher, Lawrence N.
291 Newell Road
Loveland, CO 80537 / US
[2000/13]
Representative(s)Schoppe, Fritz
Schoppe, Zimmermann, Stöckeler & Zinkler
Patentanwälte
Postfach 246
82043 Pullach bei München / DE
[N/P]
Former [2000/13]Schoppe, Fritz, Dipl.-Ing.
Schoppe, Zimmermann & Stöckeler Patentanwälte Postfach 71 08 67
81458 München / DE
Application number, filing date99109960.720.05.1999
[2000/13]
Priority number, dateUS1998015788621.09.1998         Original published format: US 157886
[2000/13]
Filing languageEN
Procedural languageEN
PublicationType: A1 Application with search report 
No.:EP0989558
Date:29.03.2000
Language:EN
[2000/13]
Search report(s)(Supplementary) European search report - dispatched on:EP29.09.1999
ClassificationIPC:G11B20/18
[2000/13]
CPC:
G11B20/1813 (EP,US)
Designated contracting statesDE,   FR,   GB,   NL [2000/49]
Former [2000/13]AT,  BE,  CH,  CY,  DE,  DK,  ES,  FI,  FR,  GB,  GR,  IE,  IT,  LI,  LU,  MC,  NL,  PT,  SE 
TitleGerman:System und Verfahren zur Fehlerbeseitigung[2000/13]
English:System and method for data error recovery[2000/13]
French:Système et procédure pour récupération d'erreurs[2000/13]
Examination procedure10.05.2000Examination requested  [2000/27]
14.08.2000Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06)
13.02.2001Reply to a communication from the examining division
23.03.2001Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
30.07.2001Reply to a communication from the examining division
31.08.2001Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
31.12.2001Reply to a communication from the examining division
31.01.2002Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M04)
31.05.2002Reply to a communication from the examining division
13.12.2002Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06)
06.05.2003Reply to a communication from the examining division
21.09.2004Despatch of a communication from the examining division (Time limit: M06)
10.02.2005Reply to a communication from the examining division
13.08.2008Application refused, date of legal effect [2009/25]
13.08.2008Date of oral proceedings
22.01.2009Despatch of communication that the application is refused, reason: substantive examination [2009/25]
22.01.2009Minutes of oral proceedings despatched
Fees paidRenewal fee
04.05.2001Renewal fee patent year 03
21.05.2002Renewal fee patent year 04
26.05.2003Renewal fee patent year 05
24.05.2004Renewal fee patent year 06
19.05.2005Renewal fee patent year 07
30.05.2006Renewal fee patent year 08
30.05.2007Renewal fee patent year 09
28.05.2008Renewal fee patent year 10
Opt-out from the exclusive  Tooltip
competence of the Unified
Patent Court
See the Register of the Unified Patent Court for opt-out data
Responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or quality of the data displayed under the link provided lies entirely with the Unified Patent Court.
Documents cited:Search[A] JPH07231430  
 [A] JPH10186224  
 [A] JPH08315395  
 [A]   PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 95, no. 11 26 December 1995 (1995-12-26) [A] 6 * abstract *
 [A]   PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 98, no. 12 31 October 1998 (1998-10-31) [A] 6 * abstract *
 [A]   PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 97, no. 3 31 March 1997 (1997-03-31) [A] 6 * abstract *
The EPO accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of data originating from other authorities; in particular, it does not guarantee that it is complete, up to date or fit for specific purposes.